Topics

• 29 Jun

  Today, most people get married and give birth in their thirties rather than when they are younger. Is it a positive or negative development in your opinion? To what extent do you support this development?

  Posted By | Type - Essay

  Being married is one essential and turning-point of life for ages. In this contemporary era, individuals prefer getting married in their thirties to being married at twenties. I strongly believe that this paradigm shift has considerable advantages as at this age couples are much mature and financially stable.

   

  To commence with, a relationship can only be healthy if both the involved persons are enough mature to understand one another. One cannot deny the fact that as the age passes one gets more mature, and due to this maturity, one can easily handle the hard-sounding problems of life. This tends to create a happy and enjoyable environment in the family that is not only beneficial for couples but also for parents and growing children. That is why, getting married at this age always has a happy family, and this is advocated by modern society.

   

  In addition, to enjoy the better lifestyle one should have a prosperous career that can only be assured by gaining good educational degrees and a few years of practical experience in renowned organizations. All these demand time and energy and that is not possible in married life due to personal responsibilities of family. Therefore, nowadays, masses tend to secure their career first before starting their married life to have a better future for the family.

   

  To recapitulate, married life can only be successful if both partners have financial freedom and a good sense of decision making. In my opinion, getting married at the thirties is fully worthy, and is more beneficial for society as there will be fewer divorces and a better life and future for the offspring as well. 

  Read More
• 29 Jun

  Internet and television providers more chances to become famous to the ordinary people. Is it a negative development or a positive development?

  Posted By | Type - Essay

  The potential of internet and television for changing the lives of ordinary people is considerable. Some liberal minds think that it brings several platforms to hype the ordinary people, but some advocates that it is not beneficial to our society. In this essay, I shall analyze both sides of the essay (viewpoint) and will advocate the positive phase of the idea.

  To begin with, internet and television – websites such as Facebook and YouTube are providing free content upload within few clicks, you can publish your art or quality with the help of these sites. A study of Yale sociologists in UK has indicated that about 70% of the worlds’ population is using internet and television nowadays so think that how fast you can spread your content around the globe. In the concise summary, internet and television helping the ordinary people to become famous as well as running wide range of business.

  On the counterpart of this, the critics who believe it is a negative development, cite that it is a big menace for one’s privacy – if 70% human being using the internet for any purpose (e.g. shopping, messaging, surfing etc.), they are using their private information to access it such as credit card information that can be hacked by hackers without upmost awareness. Someone can alter your Facebook profile using a programmed virus. They have convincing evidence to stood with the negative aspect.

  In conclusion, while both sides have strong arguments, but I will put positive aspect to the top of the table because threats are everywhere you must overcome it smartly by yourself. There is no doubt that internet provides more chances to become famous to the ordinary people.

  Read More